Broadway Grosses Dec. 6-12, 2010 sorted by Revenue per seat
The Broadway grosses are in for last week and are listed below, once again with the revenue per seat column being the source of the sorting of the list.
|
|
|
You are probably wondering how could THE MERCHANT OF VENICE have a higher Revenue Per Seat than Average Paid Admission. As you may recall from last week's post about Broadway statistics, RPS is different from APA in that it is the amount of money made per seat available that week vs. the average amount collected per admission that week. It appears that the production of Merchant did two things last week to create such a high RPS. First, they sold more tickets than their capacity(standing room is not included in the seated capacity listings), since we are basing our calculations on capacity we derive I higher RPS than APA. Second, they sold a large number of tickets above the top ticket price of $140.
Overall Broadway shows are doing a good job of maximizing RPS as 10 shows had less than a 10% difference between their RPS and APA, granted they all had over 90% capacity. It would be nice to be able to make a correlation to a shows success and the difference between RPS and APA however, it isn't that simple. Some shows may have a lower differential due to high capacity but their pricing has been discounted to the point where they are not making much profit, if any at all. Others may have a large differential and still be very profitable because they are selling enough tickets to gross above their costs.
A good example to explore the relationship between RPS and APA would be the Broadway show THE PHANTOM OF THE OPERA which had a 29% difference between their APA and RPS last week and grossed $755,601. The show has been playing for almost 23 years and has grossed almost $800,000,000. When they started their APA and RPS were the same as they were sold out immediately after opening for weeks on end. (There were no premium seat prices back then) In 1988 they had an APA of just under $42, a decade later in January of 1998, their APA was about $54 and their RPS was $49 (ticket prices had risen). A decade later, January 2008, their APA was $62 and their RPS $49. Last week their APA was $$82 and their RPS was $58 (ticket prices have risen once again). All the while they have maintained a steady RPS. Their APA for the entire run has been just over $56. They clearly know what number they need to hit to be profitable and they have figured out how to sell the house accordingly. It is not good enough to be a well-known, long running show to be successful and profitable, it requires smart ticket pricing and sales strategies to maximize revenue and maintain profitability.



Comments